*Copyright © Lyuben Piperov* July 2007

**The AD 2006 Code in the Torah
and the Time of the End: A Connection between a President of Israel and a Lord
Jesus’ Allegory Pointing to 2007**

**Lyuben Piperov**

*Abstract:**
Two independent codes manifested in more than one matrix have been found based
on the term for 2006, *תשרקתשרקו*, and two main meanings of *פרס*: (1) the name of the new *President
of Israel, Mr. Shimon **Peres***, and (2) vulture. The former meaning
links Mr. Peres’ presidency unequivocally to AD 2007. The latter meaning
of the word generates a code correlated to the well-known allegory *the Lord
Jesus

**Introduction**

On June 13^{th} 2007, Mr. **Shimon Peres**, a Nobel Prize
winner, was elected President of Israel. His inauguration is planned for July
15^{th}. I remember I was busy on the day he was elected, but the news
impressed me in a strange way. Few days later, I started a search that surprised
me with astonishing results. I will present the story as it happened chronologically,
as far as possible. I believe it is a good illustration of how Bible codes work,
and especially, that code breaking is an *emerging* phenomenon in itself,
depending not only on what is encoded in the Bible, but also on who, how and
when takes to the captivating task of revealing the hidden at the Beginning.
Moreover, I believe that the story shows that everything in the world happens
according to the Will of God. In the course of the code breaking, our brains
interact both with the Word of God, which, I believe, is a quantum computer,
on one hand and the reality in the world on the other. Indeed, at the beginning
of this study, I even did not know the spelling of Mr. **Shimon Peres**’
name in Hebrew.

First, I checked the name in the Wikipedia: פרס שמעון. As everyone in my shoes would do, I tried to
find the whole name in the Torah. It was not there. Then, I tried the whole
Tanakh. It was not there either. I realized that I will have to look for the
names separately. However, it should be clear to everyone that these names are
short terms and one could hardly find something significant using them alone,
or with a combination with the other characteristic terms, President (נשיא) and Israel (ישראל), and eventually with the
year, **5767** (תשסז[ה]) or even a particular date. In fact, I did not
search for a particular Jewish year or date until I had this work finished.
And found none of significance in the obtained matrices when tried.

I carried out the searching in a way, which I can assess now as unconsciously
stimulated, or even led. I was not aware of this, however, until much later,
when the study had gained good progress and I wondered how I had managed to
go so far. Now I have realized that the particular term I tried to associate
Mr. **Peres** and his presidency with was a peculiar way of expression of
the year 2006 I found some three years ago. Knowing that the names and the dates
taken alone would hardly produce something significant, I felt that there should
be a term that must “bind” these short terms into a meaningful structure.

**A Seeming Discrepancy in Times that
Turns out to be Not a Discrepancy**

The works in questions are **[1 - 4]**, written between June 2004
and September 2005. There, I found significant codes connected with the year
2006, which I found in the Torah expressed in a mixed Roman-Hebrew way as תשרקתשרקו, against diminishing odds (SD = 10.53). Like
with the Roman, and unlike with the Hebrew method, the numerical value of the
expression matches the number of the year: 2006.
[1] In [3], I found a code about the Writing on the Wall, in the
Book of Daniel, chapter 5. There, I mused on the meaning of the third word in
the writing, uparsin, ופרסין, which Daniel, in his interpretation,
did not pronounce in the way it was written, but as **peres**,
פרס, meaning *both* **Persian(s)**
and **division**. The code
I believe that was revealed to me, replaces ופרסין, **uparsin**
with ויהושע, **and
Joshua**, that is, as I interpret the occurrence of the name of Joshua
in the plain text of the Torah, a code for the **Lord Jesus**.

2006 passed into history and the world did not witness openly something Apocalyptic. There was no atomic Holocaust or destruction of Jerusalem. On the other hand, I had never stated that this and this will happen in 2006 or at any specified time. What I found, I believe, was a cluster of terms indicating that 2006 is a crucial year in, or a mark of, the Time of the End. My own interpretation is that 2006 was a watershed in the history – that is, situation in the world is incorrigible and irreversible since the end of 2006.

However, as a man made of clay, I lost some spirit due to the psychological
effect condescending smiles on critics’ faces cause upon a honest researcher.
Indeed, I haven’t returned to the matrix since September 2005. What instantly
made me recall this matrix was the name **Peres**. It was a sheer whim in
the beginning, to try a search for a *current* event encoded with a *passed*
period of time.

Because פרס is a 3-letter word, I did
not bother even to try at skips larger than 20. I tried also with **Shimon**,
שמעון. This is a 5-letter word
and I should have set larger skips. However, misled by the high number of occurrences
obtained at low skips, which I failed to notice that is due to its high frequency
in the plain text, as well as because I expected to obtain a matrix of ‘normal’
shape, I set skip value maximum 20 for this term too. It did not occur in the
matrices I tried in the beginning. As we will see later, this appeared to be
for good…

Having failed to find **Shimon**, I tried with **President,**
נשיא, at low skips too. To my
greatest surprise, I obtained the matrix shown in Figure 1.

**Figure 1**

__Term____
Translation Skip R Factor (in Matrix) Start
End
__

**תשרקתשרקו**** **2006 14965
2,253 4,776 Exodus Ch 38 V 31 Letter 36
Deuteronomy Ch 4 V 19 Letter 86

** ****פרס**** **Peres
-8 -1,439 1,085 Numbers Ch 14 V 32 Letter
12 Numbers Ch 14 V 31 Letter 47

** ****נשיא**** **President
-5 -1,822 0,702 Leviticus Ch 26 V 10
Letter 17 Leviticus Ch 26 V 10 Letter 2

** ****נשיא**** **President
6 -1,901 0,623 Exodus Ch 29 V 41 Letter
36 Exodus Ch 29 V 41 Letter 54

The ELS reference is 14965 characters between rows.

There are 4 displayed terms in the matrix.

The matrix starts at Exodus Ch 29 V 41 Letter 36 and ends at Deuteronomy Ch 4 V 20 Letter 5.

The matrix spans 134776 characters of the surface text.

The matrix has 10 rows, is 91 columns wide and contains a total of 910 characters.

There are 4 significant terms in the matrix.

The matrix odds are 1 chance in 45869,121 in favour of significance.

The cumulative 'R' Factor for the displayed matrix is 4,662.

In our daily life, an event occurring against the odds of **1 in about
45 000 **would be considered a genuine miracle. However, during these
about ten years of intense Bible code research worldwide, the public got used
to odds so infinitesimal, that they could be hardly imagined. Therefore, a chance
of about one in fifty thousand is accepted just as interesting. I also accepted
this value as intriguing only and urging on deeper research.

What I saw as even more intriguing than the low odds, however, was
the unusual *shape* of the matrix: narrow band consisting of 10 rows only
and over 90 columns. Was there some *meaning* in this shape? I believe
there is a very profound meaning: the letter immediately above the main term
is *aleph*, א! The numerical value of א is 1. Therefore, the numerical value of the whole
column becomes 2006 + 1 = **2007!**

In order to happen this, one of the terms – in our case **President**,
נשיא, at skip 6 - had to occur
in a specific row out of 21 possibilities! The other two terms had to occur
within the band already formed. Programs do not assess such peculiarities, of
course, but they play a very important role in cracking codes, I think.

However, the blind chance played some role in this initial enthusiasm
of mine. Indeed, if we rearrange the matrix, without the term in the top row,
we would obtain a smaller matrix of 9 rows containing once **Peres** and
once **President**, with significant, though about 3 times higher, odds.
Then, the term defining the year would be the old 2006… So, was it 2006 or **2007**?

In essence, the lower the odds, the higher the significance. On this
basis, **2007** is to be preferred to 2006. But I am never satisfied with
such weak arguments and had to press on searching for more. On this stage, however,
something unexpected occurred…

**Birds Looking for Prey in the Time
of the End**

One of the programs I use (The Keys to the Bible) has a dictionary
giving all possible meanings of a Hebrew word in the report to a matrix. In
one of the reports, something caught my eye: פרס means also **vulture**.
I did not know this before.

This immediately made me recall the illustrious words of the Lord Jesus about the Time of the End:

** Where the carcass** [or,

Even long before I got acquainted with the Bible codes, I found some
encoding aspect in these words. Most Bible scholars find a prophetic aspect
in them only, linking the vultures/eagles with the Romans in 70 AD and the carcass
with the Jewish nation that was to be dispersed in the world. There are also
endless discussions on whether the bird mentioned in Greek, **αετος**,
should mean *eagle* or *vulture*. In our modern culture, eagles are
considered to be more prestigious than vultures. Vultures have obtained the
unenviable fate of scavengers anthropomorphically reflecting the meanest human
qualities. In the ancient times, however, it was not so. In Egypt, the Nubian
vulture was synonymous with the term applied to lovers and was considered an
excellent mother. The image of a vulture stood for the hieroglyph equivalent
to the letter aleph, א **[5]**.
Who knows why, the א above the main term in the matrix, increasing
the numerical value by 1 to 2007 reminded me of an Egyptian vulture perching
on a column…

There was no reference to an article in Hebrew in the cited site, so
I had to do some browsing before finding out that פרס corresponds to *Lammergeier* or Bearded
Vulture, also known in the past as *Ossifrage* **[6]**. The latter term
means Bone Crusher, because this bird has the habit to drop large bones or even
live tortoises from high on rocks to crush them and eat marrow or fresh meat.
Interestingly, the word Lammergeier is of German origin and means *lamb-vulture*.

At first, I was content with the bird and started looking for the flesh.
I looked for carcass in the dictionaries. The first word I checked was שלד (probably SheLeD). There
appeared to be only two occurrences with low significance because the word occurs
very often. Then, I looked for the next word for carcass, פגר (PeGeR). And I hardly believed
what I saw! A word in the plain text __intersected__ פרס! The whole verse read:

*But as for you, your bodies* [or, *carcasses*] *will fall in this desert*. (Numbers 14:32)

These 3 letters are part of the single word ‘your carcasses’, פגריכם, in Hebrew. Then I saw the
same word on the other side of the main term, in verse 33! I checked for פגר in the plain text of the
Torah. These 3 letters in row occur 6 times. In 4 of these occasions, they are
part of פגריכם. Puzzled by this intersection
of ** vulture** and

The CodeFinder program loaded with the terms for search produced a matrix containing three out of the four occurrences of פגריכם and the half of all occurrences of פגר in the plain text of the Torah! See Figure 2.

**Figure 2**

__Term____
Translation Skip R Factor (in Matrix) Start
End __

פרס Vulture -8 -1,439 2,090 Numbers 14:32.12 Numbers 14:31.47

פגר Carcass 1 -0,778 2,752 Numbers 14:29.13 Numbers 14:29.15

פגר Carcass 1 -0,778 2,752 Numbers 14:32.2 Numbers 14:32.4

פגר Carcass 1 -0,778 2,752 Numbers 14:33.47 Numbers 14:33.49

The ELS reference is 58 characters between rows.

There are 4 displayed terms in the matrix.

The matrix starts at Numbers 14:28.45 and ends at Numbers 14:33.49.

The matrix spans 250 characters of the surface text.

The matrix has 5 rows, is 18 columns wide and contains a total of 90 characters.

There are 3 significant terms in the matrix.

The matrix odds are 1 chance in 179724428,037 in favour of significance.

The cumulative 'R' Factor for the displayed matrix is 8,255.

The chances are **1 in almost 180 millions!** Although linked to
the larger matrix in Figure 1 – all three terms in the two lowest rows are also
present there – it is independent and interesting in itself. First, when we
deal with words occurring in the plain text, we should evaluate the significance
of the R-factor because the program calculates it based on random combination
of the letters. If, however, the word (or its ‘mirrored’ counterpart at skip
-1) appears frequently in the text, there would be a higher probability for
a presence in a matrix. A frequently occurring word at skip ±1 devalues the
R-factor. Therefore, I had to ‘validate’ the result taking into account the
expected number of occurrences of פגר at skip ± 1. It happened
to be 4. The actual number, as we saw above, is 6, i.e. there are only two occurrences
more than the expected in the whole Torah. This means that our result practically
corresponds to what we would obtain with the same number of terms in a scrambled
text. In a word, we are justified to believe that the clustering shown above
is significant as a code.

Anyway, to ascertain the matrix parameters, I searched for clustering of פרס at skips up to ±50 and פגר in the plain text. I saw nothing even remotely resembling the picture above.

Then I realized a very specific connection of the found so far to the
original interpretation of the Writing on the Wall, which Daniel gave to the
king of Babylon in the last night of the existence of the Babylonian Empire.
Daniel emphasized the double meaning of the word **Peres**, פרס. Here, we have additional
two meanings of this same word: (1) the name of Mr. **Peres** and (2) **vulture**!
The bridge between these is our matrix of the Time of the End!

Therefore, the next step was to look for alternative words for vultures/eagles and carcass in the main matrix.

In the course of the research, I understood that there is no consensus
among the scholars on the distinguishing between eagle and vulture. It seems
also that once people did not make the difference on the basis we do it today.
This is why some of the words I found in the dictionaries refer to both meanings.
One of them is נשר (NeSheR) **[7]**. This word is used for eagle/vulture in the
Matthew’s and Luke’s Gospels cited above. I found the word with some significance
in the matrix. I proceeded with the word used in Modern Hebrew for eagle, but
also used in the Torah, along with the former one, עיט (OYT). It was also there!
Finally, I tried the word given in the dictionaries as *vulture*, but probably
in its contemporary, figurative meaning, עושק. It also occurred in the
matrix! Meanwhile, I was widening the matrix little by little in accordance
with the appropriateness of the new R-factors observed.

Having found all the terms relating to eagle
or vulture I have looked for, I turned to the various terms of carcass, or corpse,
body, etc. It turned out that a third word denoting *corpse*, *carcass*,
or *carrion*, נבלה
(NeVeLaH), occurred at skip -1. As I mentioned before, the first word I tried
for carcass, שלד, occurred twice at skip 6, but
with the gradual enlargement of the matrix due to the new incomers, they lost
their significance. However, it appeared suddenly again at skip 3, with some
significance, though small. The only word for carcass/corpse I have met in the
dictionaries, which does not appear in the matrix, is the six-letter גווייה. However, this word does not occur in the
plain text of the Torah either.
[2] The Matrix is shown in Figure 3.

**Figure 3**

__Term____
Translation Skip R Factor (in Matrix) Start
End__

תשרקתשרקו 2006 14965 2,253 4,491 Exodus 38:31.36 Deuteronomy 4:19.86

פרס Vulture -8 -1,439 0,799 Numbers 14:32.12 Numbers 14:31.47

נשר Vulture/Eagle -1 -1,934 0,304 Deuteronomy 12:31.36 Deuteronomy 12:31.34

נשר Vulture/Eagle 2 -2,235 0,003 Exodus 38:31.21 Exodus 38:31.25

עיט Eagle 1 -1,079 1,159 Genesis 3:5.52 Genesis 3:5.54

עיט Eagle -7 -1,984 0,254 Deuteronomy 24:13.13 Deuteronomy 24:12.22

עושק Vulture 9 -1,203 1,035 Genesis 50:24.85 Genesis 50:25.25

פגר Carcass 1 -0,778 1,460 Numbers 14:32.2 Numbers 14:32.4

פגר Carcass 1 -0,778 1,460 Numbers 14:33.47 Numbers 14:33.49

נבלה Carcass -1 -0,994 1,244 Exodus 29:43.12 Exodus 29:43.9

שלד Carcass 3 -2,184 0,054 Genesis 15:17.29 Genesis 15:17.35

The ELS reference is 14965 characters between rows.

There are 13 displayed terms in the matrix.

The matrix starts at Genesis 3:4.14 and ends at Deuteronomy 24:13.48.

The matrix spans 284423 characters of the surface text.

The matrix has 20 rows, is 88 columns wide and contains a total of 1760 characters.

There are 11 significant terms in the matrix.

The matrix odds are 1 chance in 10542135346,93 in favour of significance.

The cumulative 'R' Factor for the displayed matrix is 10,023.

The odds as calculated by the program for this matrix are **below
1 in 10 billions!** However, I carefully checked the terms occurring at ±1.
The R-factors are plausible for פגר, עיט and נשר. The only significant deviation is with the occurrences
of נבלה at skip -1 (37 occurrences
vs. 5 expected). However, even if we remove the R-factor, 1.244, the remaining
odds are still about **1 in six hundred millions**.

The amazing fact with this matrix is that most of the terms are short.
The individual contribution of each one of them is relatively small. Another
impressive fact is, I believe, that the sum of the R-factors for the *birds*
is 3.554; while the sum of the R-factors for the *carcasses* is 4.218 (or
2.974, with subtracted R-factor for נבלה). In both cases, the difference is within about
15%, which means that both categories contribute approximately the same ‘weight’
to the code. This corresponds in a subtle aspect to the words of the Lord Jesus
in the Gospels.

**A Search for a Name that Revealed
a Gentile Time Measure**

Although I managed to find three matrices of impressive significance,
I was by no means satisfied. Peres is not an uncommon Jewish name, so there
should be somewhere in the code an indication that the person who will be the
**President** of Israel is called **Shimon**. I could not find it in the
matrices above and gave up searching because I was seeing that the shapes, especially
that in Figure 1 – unusually elongated rectangles – have exhausted the possibilities
and שמעון is just not there. Therefore,
instead of widening the matrix, after a short reflection, I decided to use the
function of row splitting with the same values of the skips for Shimon. The
splits 2, 3 and 4 gave nothing. Then suddenly, at the 5^{th} splitting,
**Shimon**, שמעון, and the main term produced
a very narrow, this time vertical, matrix with **Shimon** at skip 1! See
Figure 4 in he left.

**Figure 4. 2006 (**תשרקתשרקו**) and Shimon (**שמעון**)
in a matrix of skip 2 993.**

The CodeFinder program calculated odds slightly above 1 in 7 000. However, knowing that the name שמעון occurs frequently in the Torah, I realized that the R-value for this word is in fact overvalued.

We have obtained another matrix of unusual shape. Two features of it impressed me very much. The first one was my own blindness. The second one was the beauty of the picture, which invites for more searches in width. Indeed, having got this matrix, I felt that there is more nearby. It turned out later that my guess was right. However, we will leave this second aspect for later consideration and will concentrate on the first one.

Every pupil knows that 5 divide every number ending in 5. I saw this when I started my first research on the 2006 code, of course, but who knows why (I have surely been preoccupied with something seeming more important to me at that time), I had not looked for any other factors of 14 965 – the skip of the main term.

When I saw the letters of the main term forming a straight column, I was surprised at first but within a second I saw that it should be a column, because the skip is divided by 5. Then I recalled that the number of letters of the Torah, 304 805, also divides by 5 resulting in 60 961, a prime number. I was curious about whether the quotient of the skip, 2 993, is prime too, in analogy to the number of the letters in the Torah.

One does not need to check every prime number for dividing a large number to verify if it is a prime. It is sufficient to check the numbers up to the square root of the tested number, which in our case is 54 odd. So, I started checking the prime numbers one by one, from 7 up. Numbers were failing to divide 2 993 and I was foretasting the end result: prime number, when suddenly, few numbers before the last one, the calculator displayed 73 in response to dividing by 41. Now it is clear:

**14 965 = 5
× 41 × 73**

Then it hit me!

**5
× 73 = 365!**

What a watermark! I looked at this for many minutes, praising and revering
The Encoder. I was utterly surprised seeing this Egyptian number encoded in
the skip of 2006. Indeed, rethinking on what was before my eyes, I realized
that there could be hardly found more appropriate number characterizing Egypt.
The number of the days we have in an ordinary year, 365, comes from ancient
Egypt **[8]**. According to the Egyptian mythology, it was Thoth (known as
Hermes in Greece) who added 5 days to the 360-day year used before **[9]**.
The Hebrew year is *never* 365 days long. In addition, the number of the
occurrences of Egypt, מצרים, in the plain text of the
Torah is exactly 365. Along with the significance of the vulture, here we have
another Egyptian feature in the code…

In my previous work on the Writing on the Wall **[3]**, I linked
the sexagesimal system (base 60) **[10]**, the system typical for Babylon,
which we still use for measuring of time – 60 seconds in a minute; 60 minutes
in an hour – with an interpretation of the writing on the wall encoded in number
characteristic for *columns.* There, I had to use the Golden Ratio as a
key to validate the findings. Here, a number distinguishing the other great
Middle East ancient civilization, Egypt, is encoded between the *rows*.
Is here also a key for confirmation?

The skip of our main term is **41** times **365**. Seems like
41 years of 365 days each… The first thought that came up to my mind was to
link the remaining quotient, 41, with the time of the wandering of Israel in
the wilderness, the time elapsed since the 6 Day War, etc… I sharpened my pencil
and was about to start a long treatise on number 41 and its significance for
numerology… But immediately I changed my mind and decided for another approach.
Instead of theorizing in Aristotelian manner, I made my mind up for *looking*.

The main term consists of 9 letters. On the other hand, these letters
are parts of 9 words. I decided for counting the overall number of the letters
in these 9 words. It turned out to be **exactly 41!** See Figure 5.

**Figure 5. The 9 words, which
the main term 2006 (**תשרקתשרקו**) intersects at skip 14 965 are shown in different colours.
Note that the words most outstretched away from the column define a perfect
9×9 square. There are 41 coloured letters in the matrix.**

The expected number of the letters in these 9 words based on the average number of letters per word in the Torah, 3.81, is 34.29. If normal distribution is assumed, 41 is not a so much large deviation (SD = 1.15; that is, odds are about 1 in 3). However, the distribution in this particular case is by no means normal. The shortest word is just two letters long, so the minimum number of the letters 9 words can consist of is 9×2 = 18. On the other hand, 7- or more-letter words are rare. (There is one 7-letter word in the matrix above.) Based on the lowest possible number that 9 randomly chosen words contain, 18, we could define an upper limit for the number of letters, which can be never passed practically at about 51. [3] Thus, 41 appear to be a quite significant deviation hinting at encoding. For instance, the 9 words in the same column above our term contain 37 letters.

The number of the letters in the 9×9 matrix is 81. This number
immediately reminded me of the number of the elementary cells in the Sudoku
game. I believe that Sudoku is a good example of how quantum computation works.
I wrote about this in another work of mine **[11]**.

The only other feature of 41 I could remember is that written in the binary code, it is the ‘mirrored’ image of the number 37 expressed in the same way:

**37 _{10} = 100101_{2}**

**41 _{10} = 101001_{2}**

Number 37 is encoded in the Torah. I managed to find it in the binary
expression of the number of the letters of the Torah, but there are many more
aspects of significance **[11]**. (Isn’t this particular property of the
numbers 37 and 41 a mark distinguishing Jews from Gentiles? 37 and 41 are two
consecutive prime numbers; 37 is loaded with significance in the Torah, which
is given to the Jews. Mirroring is indication of similarity.)

Having found such significant codes associated with number 2006/7 encoded
in the Torah, we will have to revise the famous “Rosetta-stone” type prophetic
words above the main term **[3, 4]**:

**For a Time, Times and a Half [Daniel
7:25; 12:7; Revelation 12:14]**

First, these words appear in Aramaic, then in Hebrew and finally in
Greek. I managed to find them, in Hebrew, with only two letters - those defining
the plural for times (*yod*
and *mem* final) - missing in the original matrix **[1, 4]**. I found
each one of these words once only and was satisfied with the result. Later,
I also found Time of the End (קץ עת), as used by Daniel, within the cluster **[4]**.
When I was doing these articles, I looked for symmetry mostly and therefore
tried to obtain matrices with the main term approximately in the middle of the
matrix. The matrices I have obtained so far in this work taught me that high
significance with short terms could be obtained even with more elongated and
asymmetrical matrices. I reviewed my old matrices and searched for more occurrences,
preferably with higher significances, of the old terms.

I did not find many more: just once the term and a half (וחצי) at skip 12. This appeared to be the only occurrence with some significance according to the programs I use. After closer inspection of the found, however, what I saw exceeded my boldest expectations. See Figure 6.

**Figure 6. 2006 (**תשרקתשרקו**), red ovals at skip 14 965; for time (**למועד**) turquoise ovals, skip 1; time (**מועד**) blue ovals at skip -29 918; and half (**וחצי**) green squares at skips 12 and -14 962 and Time of the End
**(קץ
עת),** plum watches, at skip
29 941.**

What you see in Figure 6, I did it manually. Programs do not assess
these occurrences as significant. However, in my opinion, they are *very *significant.
(I managed to obtain the identical matrix with the CodeFinder program, which
I cannot show because of the character of the consideration. The report, however,
will be presented below.)

First, all terms share a letter with another term of the cluster. למועד and מועד share a *mem*;
מועד shares a *vav* with both occurrences of וחצי; finally וחצי at skip 12 shares a *tsadik*
with קץ עת. This fact defines the items as a ** net**
rather than as a typical

Then, I noticed that all terms, regardless of the sign of their skips,
*go from right to left*. I believe that this is a very subtle way to hint
at the time arrow going always in one direction only – from the past to the
future. Here, the direction coincides with that of the Hebrew script. This is
especially significant, I believe, because there is a word in the plain text,
** for time**, למועד, which defines the direction.

What impressed me next was the double occurrence of the term ** and
half** וחצי. At first glance, it seems that the occurrence
at skip -14 962 is redundant. Its absence would not affect the characteristics
of the cluster/net. But it must have a meaning… Half…

Then I realized that the prophetic words and the Time of the End occupy
*exactly* the **half** of the matrix! The total number of the rows comprising
the whole Torah at this skip and place are 21. However, the main term is 9 letters
long. The prophetic words occupy a rectangle of 9 rows. (I drew a dashed line
separating the two ‘compartments’.) As it turns out, the main term and the prophetic
words validate each other in such amazing way. I tried for any term of the prophecy
or Time of the End in the bottom compartment but there appeared to be none.

Another attribute of the matrix I found interesting is its width: exactly
50 columns. 50 is the number of the years in a jubilee cycle. Thus, we have
another specific measure for time. While I was musing on the meaning of the
number of the columns, I noticed that the letter in the upper left corner of
the matrix is the letter following *dalet*, ד, in מועד at skip -29 918. It
is *mem*, מ (marked with blue oval contour). I knew
this fact from my previous studies, when I tried to find the word in plural,
מועדים, but failed. Then, it was
of no importance because this absence made the matrix more compact and gave
me the opportunity to apply the *inverted nuns* **[12]** for balancing
these two missing letters **[1]**.

Now, however, seeing the letter *mem* in the corner, I decided
for searching deeper. Once it is within the matrix, there should be some meaning
I have failed to recognize before. I checked for the word מועדם and found it used once only
in the Torah and never again in the Tanakh. It is in Lev. 23:4, in the form
במועדם, denoting *in their
appointed times* (or

וחצי מועדם למועד

**For a time, their times and
a half**

Who’s times? The times of the Gentiles? And all this intertwined with the Time of the End!

As I promised above, here is the report on the matrix in Figure 6.
I inserted it here because I had to load the term *their times*, מועדם, which we have just discussed. Even so, the only
significant terms, along with the main term, 2006, are *for a time*, למועד, and *and a half*,
וחצי, at skip 12:

__Term____
Translation Skip R Factor (in Matrix)
Start End __

תשרקתשרקו 2006 14965 2,253 4,782 Exodus Ch 38 V 31 Letter 36 Deuteronomy Ch 4 V 19 Letter 86

למועד for a time 1 -2,155 0,374 Exodus Ch 29 V 42 Letter 20 Exodus Ch 29 V 42 Letter 24

מועדם their times -29918 -3,928 -1,399 Exodus Ch 29 V 42 Letter 21 Genesis Ch 3 V 6 Letter 18

וחצי and a half 12 -1,366 1,163 Exodus Ch 10 V 22 Letter 11 Exodus Ch 10 V 22 Letter 47

וחצי and a half -14962 -4,429 -1,900 Exodus Ch 10 V 22 Letter 11 Genesis Ch 32 V 31 Letter 6

עתקץ Time of the End 29941 -3,831 -1,302 Genesis Ch 3 V 5 Letter 32 Exodus Ch 10 V 22 Letter 35

The ELS reference is 14965 characters between rows.

There are 6 displayed terms in the matrix.

The matrix starts at Genesis Ch 3 V 5 Letter 28 and ends at Deuteronomy Ch 4 V 20 Letter 9.

The matrix spans 254455 characters of the surface text.

The matrix has 18 rows, is 50 columns wide and contains a total of 900 characters.

There are 3 significant terms in the matrix.

The matrix odds are 1 chance in 6154,38 in favour of significance

The cumulative ‘R’ factor for the displayed matrix is 3,789

Note: The colours of the terms in this box have been harmonized with those in Figure 6.

The program evaluates the odds to be slightly below 1 in six thousand.
However, *for a time*, למועד, occurs 143 times in the
plain text vs. 0 expected, which means that the R-factor should be considerably
decreased. Anyway, even based on the significance of the occurrence of וחצי at skip 12 in the clustering
alone, the odds of this matrix are not above **1 in 2 600**.

All these findings confirm that the terms we find encoded with the main term of the matrix relate to the Time of the End. And that if we find any contemporary event encoded there, we will know where we are in the time schedule of the Word of God. Well, at least according to Daniel 12…

This whets my appetite for searching of a word still elusive so far.

**In Search for a Forename**

The only term still missing was Mr. **Peres’** forename, **Shimon**.
Although I found it in Figure 4, I did not assess this finding as something
significant, because it is in the plain text and there is no **Peres** and
**President** nearby. (One occurrence of **Peres** and one occurrence
of **President** should be close by, of course, because these terms occurred
in the lines with letters of the main term in Figure 1.) Therefore, I revised
the settings and started a gradual widening of the search after careful selection
of the parameters. Soon, the program produced a matrix, which made me staring
at it in awe for hours… See Figure 7.

**Figure 7**

__Term____
Translation Skip R Factor (in Matrix) Start
End __

תשרקתשרקו 2006 14965 2,253 4,192 Exodus 38:31.36 Deuteronomy 4:19.86

פרס Peres -8 -1,439 0,500 Numbers 14:32.12 Numbers 14:31.47

נשיא President* 1 -1,833 0,107 Numbers 3:32.2 Numbers 3:32.5

נשיא President* 1 -1,833 0,107 Numbers 3:32.6 Numbers 3:32.9

נשיא President 1 -1,833 0,107 Numbers 7:54.11 Numbers 7:54.14

נשיא President -5 -1,822 0,118 Leviticus 11:9.28 Leviticus 11:9.13

נשיא President -5 -1,822 0,118 Leviticus 26:10.17 Leviticus 26:10.2

שמעון Shimon 1 -1,591 0,348 Numbers 13:5.5 Numbers 13:5.9

שמעון Shimon 4 -0,245 1,694 Leviticus 25:3.2 Leviticus 25:3.18

The ELS reference is 2993 characters between rows.

There are 9 displayed terms in the matrix.

The matrix starts at Exodus 38:30.48 and ends at Deuteronomy 4:20.5.

The matrix spans 119805 characters of the surface text.

The matrix has 41 rows, is 85 columns wide and contains a total of 3485 characters.

There are 9 significant terms in the matrix.

The matrix odds are 1 chance in 224848,851 in favour of significance.

The cumulative 'R' Factor for the displayed matrix is 5,352.

*Terms marked with asterisk (*) form part of the unique for Torah combination of words denoting Prince of Princes נשיאי נשיא

Even if we completely remove the R-factors for both **Shimon** and
**President** at skip 1, because these words occur considerably more often
than expected, the remaining odds will be slightly above **1 in 80 000!**
As expected, the occurrences of Peres, פרס, at skip -8 and one of the occurrences **President**, נשיא, at skip -5 are here too. However, the newcomers, especially those
in the far right, are astoundingly impressive!

First, we have **Shimon**, שמעון, at its next-to-the-lowest
skip above 1 in the Torah, 4. **Peres**, פרס, is close by. **President**,
נשיא, occurs doubled in the unique
combination of ** Prince of the princes** [RV] (or,

Even more astonishing, however, was the fact that when I tried to prepare a matrix with them only, independent of the main term, I failed! All programs refused to prepare a matrix at skip 2 993 with terms occurring at skips up to ±8. This skip, 2 993, is the only possibility to bring these three terms so close together! Therefore, our main term acts from distance. I prepared a matrix manually. See Figure 7.

**Figure 7. Shimon (**שמעון**), blue watches, at skip 4; Peres (**פרס**), plum watches, at skip -8; and the only doubled occurrence
of President (**נשיא

Is this the smallest possible matrix with these three terms? The answer
for these particular occurrences of **Shimon** and **Peres** along with
the doubled occurrence of **President** is ‘yes’. The number of the rows
between the top row and the middle one is 4, while that between the middle and
the bottom one is 7. These are relatively prime numbers and there is no way
to bring these three items closer. But, besides this occurrence, ** Shimon**
appears 39 times in the plain text and once at skip -3;

Apart from this, there is another most intriguing facet in the picture
above. Number *six*, שש, is mentioned twice in the
top row. The verse, part of which is there, is Lev. 25:3: ** For six years
sow your fields, and for six years prune your vineyards and gather their
crops.** This is the closest occurrence of the words

The number of the rows in the matrix is the number explicitly mentioned
in the top row, six, *doubled*: **2×6 =** **12**. Finally,
the total number of letters in the matrix, 216, is the cube of 6: **216 = 6×6×6.**

So, we have in this matrix the closest possible
double appearance of ** President / Prince / Chief** as well as the
closest possible

The criterion I set was the value of the odds of the terms included in the matrix. Of course, sooner or later, a term would occur in the matrix, making it larger. It will add some significance, but at the same time would ‘eat up’ some significance of the terms already present there, due to the larger area they would be located in.

The maximum number of rows of the Torah at skip 14 965 is 21.
I set many more columns and increased the skip for **Shimon**, שמעון, from 20 to 50… I cannot
describe my feelings when I saw the matrix in Figure 8!

**Figure 8**

__Term____
Translation Skip R Factor (in Matrix) Start
End
__

**תשרקתשרקו**** **2006
14965 2,253 4,513 Exodus 38:31.36
Deuteronomy 4:19.86

** ****פרס**** **Peres
-8 -1,439 0,821 Numbers 6:16.12
Numbers 6:15.50

** ****פרס**** **Peres
-8 -1,439 0,821 Numbers 14:32.12
Numbers 14:31.47

** ****נשיא**** **President -5 -1,822 0,438 Leviticus
26:10.17 Leviticus 26:10.2

** ****נשיא**** **President 6 -1,901 0,359 Exodus
29:41.36 Exodus 29:41.54

** ****שמעון**** **Shimon
-23 -1,005 1,255 Numbers 23:1.23
Numbers 22:40.15

The ELS reference is 14965 characters between rows.

There are 6 displayed terms in the matrix.

The matrix starts at Exodus 29:41.20 and ends at Deuteronomy 4:21.8.

The matrix spans 134852 characters of the surface text.

The matrix has 10 rows, is 167 columns wide and contains a total of 1670 characters.

There are 6 significant terms in the matrix.

The matrix odds are 1 chance in 884490,895 in favour of significance.

The cumulative 'R' Factor for the displayed matrix is 5,947.

I have never seen such a strange matrix before as that in Figure 8.
The length-to-width ratio is almost 17 to 1! Indeed, **President**, נשיא, appeared few times above the top row of the matrix, but at skips
much larger than 6. If I included them into the matrix, they increased the odds
due to the enlarged area. There was even one occurrence within the matrix, at
skip 11, which turned out to have negative R-factor and I deleted it from the
list.

Another remarkable fact with the latter matrix is that the second occurrence
of **Peres**, פרס, at skip -8 in the far left
occupies a place that extends the matrix to the left just enough to *decrease*
the odds we would obtain without it! I checked the odds with a matrix with a
left border as in Figure 1. (That is, just including the occurrence of **President**,
נשיא, at skip -5, to the left
of the main term.) The cumulative R-factor appeared to be 5.899 and the odds
1 in 792 501. (The respective numbers for Figure 8 are 5.947 and 884 491.)
As far as I can evaluate, had the term occurred just four places further to
the left, the matrix would have become large enough to increase the chances
to above 1 in 792 501.

The matrix odds from Figure 1 decreased about 20 times, down to almost
**1 in 900 000!** And also **Shimon** occurred there, at skip -23!
There is another occurrence of **Peres** too – in the far left, at the same
skip -8. So now we have all three terms we started searching for in the beginning.
In addition, the matrix did not gain a single row! The additional terms emerged
in a very distinguishing way. They could locate in a new row – there are 8 rows
above and 3 rows below the band. This could happen so that the matrix odds could
be the same or even lower. Instead, both newcomers set themselves within the
narrow band defined by the **numerical value** of the column with the main
term: **2007!**

**Reflections on the Role of Ignorance
in Discovering**

Ignorance and subconscious sometimes play decisive and significant
role for the revelation of information. One of the best known examples I am
aware of is the D-Day crosswords panic in Britain in the summer of 1944 **[13]**.
Shortly before the invasion of the Allies into Normandy, many of the codenames
of this vital operation appeared in a British newspaper as crossword answers.
Their occurrence in the newspaper day after day panicked MI5 because they thought
that this is a way to pass information to the Germans. The investigation carried
out revealed that the crosswords were compiled by a teacher, who asked his teenage
boy pupils to insert words in crossword patterns and then created the clues.
These boys spent much of their time out of school in the field, where American,
British and Canadian servicemen were exchanging information while preparing
for the operation, turning blind eyes to the boys hanging about and sucking
in every word coming out of their mouths.

I believe that ignorance and subconscious interacted in my mind in
most productive way. Indeed, I cannot assess the role of the chances in the
course of this research. I am almost certain that I would hardly have started
it at all had the third word in Daniel’s interpretation of the Writing on the
Wall *not* been **peres**, פרס. Now, looking back, I see
that had I set slightly different terms for obtaining the matrix in Figure 1,
I would have got that in Figure 8 on first attempt and
then, at least the matrix in Figure 7, would have remained almost certainly
hidden from me. I would be satisfied with the result and would not bother looking
deeper. A good example of the positive role of ignorance, isn’t it?…

How Bible codes are cracked? Even, what *are* they at all? How
many codes are there now, how many of them will be revealed and how many will
remain forever buried? Chances are characteristic not only of clustering of
terms in matrices but also of the process of bringing them to light. Obviously,
the processes defining thoughts in our minds depend to and interact with the
tiniest and seemingly most unimportant or un-influential processes in the Universe. The word Peres, פרס, mentioned above, played
the role of the overheard word inserted in a crossword. This word comes from
the depth of history. However, while browsing in the Internet looking for more
information about the difference between eagles and vultures, I noticed that
this same Hebrew word, פרס, is linked in a deeply mysterious way with code-cracking even
in our computer era. Here is the example that impressed me very much.

A group of mathematicians called RSA **[14]** created an algorithm
for public-key cryptography in 1977. It is widely used today. It has become
the algorithm of choice for encrypting Internet credit-card transactions, securing
e-mail and authenticating phone calls **[15]**. The security of the code
is in essence in the practical impossibility to factorize large numbers using
classical, deterministic computers. (We factorized 14 965 to its factors
5, 41 and 73 above. But 14 965 is by no means a large number. Large numbers
are considered those consisting of thousands of digits.) The only way, it is
believed now, to crack such codes is through using *quantum computers*.
There is already an algorithm called Shor’s algorithm created for this purpose
in 1994 **[16]**. The fact that we have obtained at least one matrix (Fig.
7), which the current programs failed to display is a good evidence that some
aspects of Bible code breaking are analogous to quantum computation.

The group of mathematicians mentioned above prepared a challenge ciphertext
linked to the algorithm cited above and published it in Scientific American
magazine in 1977. This problem proved to be a tough challenge to the world.
It was cracked as late as in 1993-1994. The solution was… “**The
Magic Words are Squeamish Ossifrage”!** **[17] **This
started a tradition of using “squeamish ossifrage” in cryptanalytic challenges.
פרס is here again, pointing
as always to codes!

I was almost finishing this work when, while reviewing protocols spotted
that פרס means also **reward**…
What a proper word for the consolation in this hard **Time of the End** of
those looking forward to the **Coming
Messiah and His Kingdom of God
on Earth!**

**Conclusion: An Attempt for Estimation
of the Odds**

We have obtained three main matrices: (1) the matrix in Figure 8 revealing the code of Mr. Shimon Peres’ Presidency linked to 2007; (2) the matrix in Figure 7 revealing a code of the same event without specifying time and (3) the matrix in Figure 3 about the code of eagles/vultures and carcasses, which illustrates a famous Evangelical allegory about the Time of the End told by the Lord Jesus to His disciples. Besides that, we obtained two ‘auxiliary’ matrices, Figures 2 and 6, which either contain predominantly terms already found in another matrix (Fig. 2), or have not direct link to specific terms but to the characteristic of the current epoch and the main term, 2006 (Fig. 6).

One can hardly estimate the overall odds for all these findings. Even
if we consider the matrices in Figures 3 and 8 alone, where we have one common
term only, **Peres**, פרס, along with the main term, and therefore
are in the right to regard them as *independent*, [5] the overall chances are as low
as **well below 10 ^{-14}**. This is

However, it is not the diminishing odds alone that are so much amazing,
but also the process of obtaining them. I tried to show the reader how all this
happens. The algorithm, if any, is probably an advanced version of the abovementioned
Shor’s algorithm. It is based on probabilistic approach to the solution, unlike
the classical one, which first finds the solution and then estimates the probabilities.
Indeed, we do not know whether there is a closer location of the terms in Figure
7. But we do not need to either. We do not calculate the answer. We *see*
it.

This seeing is possible only when we compare our experience and expectations
with what we find hidden in the Word. All this happens according to the Will
of the Encoder, the Spirit of the Lord
God. This is why, I believe, would never have started this research before hearing
about the election of **Mr. Shimon Peres President of Israel**.

**July 14 ^{th} 2007**

**Sofia, Bulgaria**

**References**

**[1]** *A
Strange Code about AD 2006 Discovered in the Torah:*

http://exodus2006.com/2006piperov.htm

http://www.carelinks.net/books/lp/2006a.htm

http://www.ad2004.com/Biblecodes/Hebrewmatrix/2006a.pdf

**[2]** *Protocol
of a Statistical Evaluation of Some Items in the AD 2006 Matrix:*

http://exodus2006.com/Protocol.htm

http://www.carelinks.net/books/lp/protocol2006.htm

http://www.ad2004.com/Biblecodes/Hebrewmatrix/Protocol2006.pdf

**[3]** *The
Writing on the Wall and AD 2006: A Lateral Approach to Code Breaking:*
http://exodus2006.com/lyuben/writing-on-the-wall.htm
; http://www.carelinks.net/books/lp/2006.htm

**[4] ***The AD 2006 Code: The Significance of
the Short Terms. Part 1: The Rising of the Lord, the Time of the End, Number
Nine and the Month of Av: *http://exodus2006.com/lyuben/The_LORD_will_rise.htm

http://www.carelinks.net/books/lp/risingindex.htm

**[5]** Vulture: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulture

**[6]** Lammergeier: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lammergeier
; In Hebrew (פרס): http://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%A1_%28%D7%A2%D7%95%D7%A3%29

**[7] **New Testament in Hebrew: http://dvar-adonai.org/hnt/HntHe_en.htm

**[8] **Egyptian calendar: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptian_calendar

**[9] **Thoth: http://www.crystalinks.com/thoth.html

**[10] **Sexagesimal system: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexagesimal

**[11] ***From Genesis to Genetics and Back. Part
2: Words, Flesh and History of the World:* http://ad2004.com/Biblecodes/articles/Genesisgenetics.pdf

http://exodus2006.com/lyuben/Genesis-to-Genetics2.doc

http://www.carelinks.net/books/lp/genetics.htm

**[12]** Inverted nun: http://www.hebrew4christians.com/Grammar/Unit_One/Aleph-Bet/Nun/nun.html

**[13]** Crossword Panic May 1944:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/05/03/nxword03.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/05/03/ixnewstop.html

http://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/England-History/Crossword.htm;

http://wilsonsalmanac.blogspot.com/2004/06/216-d-day-crossword-coincidence-june-6.html

**[14] **RSA: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA

**[15] **Sara Robinson*, Still Guarding Secrets after Years of Attacks, RSA Earns
Accolades for its Founders*: http://www.msri.org/people/members/sara/articles/rsa.pdf

**[16] **Shor’s algorithm: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shor%27s_algorithm

**[17]** Squeamish Ossifrage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squeamish_ossifrage

**[18]** Moshe Aharon Shak, *Shimon Peres – Wins:* http://www.biblecodedigest.com/page.php/528

**Contact Lyuben Piperov
at: l_piperov@yahoo.co.uk**

[1] For instance, the numerical value of the full expression of the current Hebrew year 5 767, התשסז, is 767 + 5 = 772.

[2] I managed to find a matrix containing תשרקתשרקו (2006) and גווייה at skip -39 926, in a matrix of ELS 4 998 and chances 1 in 179, but I do not evaluate this finding as something substantially significant.

[3] I calculated this value by subtracting 18 from the average number
expected, 34.29, which gives 16.29, and adding the latter number to the average
34.29. The result is 50.58. This is not, unlike 18, a *theoretical* limit,
of course. It is just at the same distance from the average as the lower limit
is.

[4] Six years, שנים שש, consists of 6 letters, so there are two letters remaining for something grammatically meaningful to be inserted before the next occurrence at skip 7. For the next skip multiple of 7: 14, this number is already 8, as is in the matrix.

[5] The chance for the **simultaneous** occurrence of two or more independent
events such as the probability of getting two six in throwing of dice is obtained
by **multiplication of the chances for each individual outcome**. For example,
the probability for getting double six with a single throwing of two dice
is 1/6×1/6 = 1/36. The odds 1 in million billions are just the product
of the multiplication of the individual odds obtained for each matrix in the
reports attached to the respective figures.